| |
According
to their Rank: Masonry and the American Revolution, 1775--1792
Steven Bullock
The King of
Sweden, the Rev. William Smith informed the Boston Ancients in October
1780, attended the recent installation of the new Grand Master of
that country. According to the newspaper account Smith quoted in
the letter, the monarch gave the new Grand Master "an ermin'd
cloke." Then he "was placed upon a Throne, clothed with
the marks of his new Dignity, and there received the Complements
of all the members." The Masons came up "according to
their rank ¼ to kiss the Hand, Sceptre, or Cloke of the new
Grand Master." In turn, he gave each a Silver medal prepared
for the ceremony. "This solemnity," stated the newspaper,
"hath raised the Order of Freemasons from a kind of Oblivion
into which they were sunk."
Smith, speaker
at both Philadelphia's 1755 Modern and the 1779 Ancient processions,
did not recount this story as a mere curiosity. As Grand Secretary
of the Pennsylvania Ancients, he hoped to convince the Massachusetts
Grand Lodge to support Pennsylvania's proposal of a Grand Master
General---an officer to preside over all American lodges. The "magnificent"
Swedish ceremony, he suggested, "may serve ¼ as a model
for us."
Despite Smith's
dreams of magnificence, fears of the oblivion that nearly engulfed
the Swedish brothers could not have been far from his mind. The
Revolution created a multifaceted crisis within the American fraternity.
It disrupted meetings and split lodges as brothers took differing
positions on the Revolution. The break from Britain also raised
questions about the ultimate legitimacy of American Masonry---for
the mother country had been the source of Masonic authority as well.
Even in the Continental Army, the one bright spot in the wartime
fraternity, the brothers were at times preoccupied with these difficulties.
Making the original proposal for a national Grand Lodge at the beginning
of 1780, they warned not only of "the relaxation of virtue
amongst individuals," but also about "the present dissipated
and almost abandoned condition of our lodges in general."
The military
lodges that met within the Army's camps faced no such difficulties.
Officers flocked into Masonry during the Revolution. But the success
of Masonry within the Continental Army only highlights the crisis
the officers themselves faced. The officers felt acutely their lack
of the social standing deemed necessary for their positions and
the diversities of local origins, religion, and rank created by
their new circumstances. For these men, Masonry's ideals of honor
and love offered a powerful means of addressing these difficulties,
so powerful that Masonic bonds played an important role in building
the camaraderie necessary for the survival of the army---and the
American republic.
The fraternity
that emerged from the war was stronger than ever before. This rather
unexpected result came not because it took up the scepters and thrones
prescribed by Smith but because the fraternity, despite the uncertainties
created by the war, was able to align itself with both the Revolutionary
cause and with the republican society it attempted to create. To
understand this unanticipated result, the problems of the older
civilian lodges deserve attention first, difficulties visible in
another attempt to create magnificence in the midst of near-oblivion.
I. Great
Trubles amonge Masons
When General
Joseph Warren, Grand Master of the Ancient Grand Lodge of Massachusetts,
died at the Battle of Bunker Hill in June 1775, the British threw
his body into an unmarked grave. The British evacuation the following
March allowed the recovery of the body and a funeral organized by
Warren's Masonic brothers. Accompanied by their Modern counterparts
(invited for the occasion), and two companies of Soldiers, Boston's
Ancients marched from the Council Chambers to the Anglican King's
Chapel. The Rev. Dr. Samuel Cooper, a Revolutionary leader, led
the prayer; Perez Morton, a Harvard-educated lawyer and a new member
of St. Andrew's, gave the oration. Portraying Warren as the embodiment
of virtue, Morton recalled that the former Grand Master believed
"that nothing so much conduced to enlighten Mankind, and advance
the great End of Society at large, as the frequent Interchange of
Sentiments, in friendly Meetings." Morton noted that Warren
often followed his own advice: "we find him constantly engaged
in this eligible Labour; but on none did he place so high a Value
as on the most honorable of all the detached Societies, THE FREE
ACCEPTED MASONS."
The rich images
of the celebration contrasted strongly with the actual condition
of Boston Masonry. Even before the Declaration of Independence,
St. Andrew's lodge had faced problems that plagued American brothers
during the war and afterward. Simply continuing to meet proved difficult.
Hindered by British occupation, the lodge stopped meeting in April
1775 just before Lexington and Concord. It revived only in the following
year. The issue of Revolutionary loyalty furthermore split the lodge.
While General Warren led American troops at Bunker Hill, his lodge
brother Dr. John Jeffries aided the British. Jefferies and a number
of other members left with the British in 1776---after he revealed
the location of his Grand Master's body.
In facing difficulties
raised by disruption and questions of loyalty, Boston Ancients were
not unique. Fighting, mobilization, and occupation impeded Masonic
activities throughout America, particularly in the interior. Indeed,
Boston's Ancients were unusual in their quick recovery, made possible
by the shifting of the fighting to other areas. Their strong Patriot
contingent furthermore kept the Loyalists in their ranks from having
much influence, preventing division and further disruptions that
many other lodges, even in Boston, could not escape. While these
problems of continuing meetings and deciding loyalties would sometimes
be easily resolved, they also often created unforeseen consequences,
hastening the demise of the Moderns in many areas and contributing
to Masonry's later reputation as a strongly patriotic organization.
Boston lodges
Boston lodges,
at the center of the earliest fighting of the Revolution, were only
the first to face the problems of wartime meetings. The eight years
of hostilities disrupted Masonic meetings in all parts of America.
New York's Modern Lodge No. 3 held no meetings at all during the
war. Charleston Masons seemingly did not assemble from 1778 to 1780.
In Philadelphia, Lodge No. 8 stopped meeting during the British
occupation, while No. 2, the city's oldest Ancient Lodge, had its
jewels and paraphernalia stolen by British soldiers. Even as late
as 1785, the Pennsylvanians excused the inaction of their Winchester,
Virginia subordinate noting: "The late War has caused great
trubles amonge Masons of which you have had more than Common Share."
*
* *
This excerpt is from Heredom, the
transactions of the Scottish Rite Research Society
Volume IV, Year 1995
©1995-2002, Scottish Rite Research Society
All Rights Reserved
Scottish Rite Research Society
1733 16th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20009-3103
202-232-3579 voice, 202-383-1847 fax
srrs@srmason-sj.org, www.srmason-sj.org
|